Home
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Today's most viewed
EDITOR'S CHOICE

VOTE
Do you think that the Goshen Park site should be turned over to property developers?
Click here to vote.

We have a fantastic array of hot deals, cruises, day trips and sporting breaks run by our friendly staff at the Reader Travel Office.

YOU SAY: YOUR LETTERS
NEWS FROM RAMSBOTTOM, TOTTINGTON AND DISTRICT
No jail for kitchen boss who says ‘justice has been done’
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
Pension pay out to council workers is on the increase

BURY residents are paying £53 each to keep council workers in gold plated' pensions.

Figures from the TaxPayers' Alliance show that Bury's spending on pensions has risen by 14 per cent in one year, from £8.5 million to £9.7 million.

The per head' cost is the third lowest in Greater Manchester, behind Stockport and Trafford: the city itself pays the most, at £100 per resident.

The Alliance is demanding that ministers reform the local government pension scheme, and that councils do not pay enhanced years' to people who leave early.

But John Ransford of the Local Government Association (LGA), said: "The TaxPayers' Alliance appears to be condemning lollipop ladies, bin men, street cleaners and librarians for getting a pension worthy of the years of service they have given helping local people "Councils provide more than 800 different services for local residents and these cannot be delivered by robots or machines."

Mr Mike Owen, Bury's director of finance, said pension costs were largely outside the control of individual councils.

"The scheme is a national one, and the rate that the council has to pay is heavily influenced by matters such as death/survival rates and pension fund investment returns.

"We do pay enhanced years, but only within very strict criteria and only when there is a robust business case. In fact the council has consistently underspent the allowance' that the pension fund make for early retirement costs within Bury.

"The pension scheme has recently been reformed and this means that in future employees will pay more into the fund whilst seeing tighter access to retirement benefits."

Mr Owen added: "We also support wholeheartedly the points made by the LGA in their response."

2:55pm Thursday 6th March 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
Search Jobs, Homes & Cars in the Bury area
Powered by Powered by Fish4

Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network